The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
The manuscript should not have been published previously (in part or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please be transparent on the re-use of any materials to avoid any doubt of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)).
A single study should not be split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions, then submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (eg “salami-publishing”).
No data should be fabricated or manipulated (including images) in order to support conclusions.
No data, text, or theories by others should be presented as if they were the authors' own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes any materials that are directly cited, summarized and/or paraphrased). Quotation marks are used for direct citation of materials, and permission must be secured for material that is copyrighted.
Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.
All co-authors and responsible authorities where the work was carried out must give their consent to publish before the work is submitted.
Authors whose names appear on the submitted paper have contributed sufficiently to the work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.
In addition:
Changes in authorship or in the order of the authors' names are not accepted once the manuscript has been accepted. Requests to add or delete authors at the revision stage or after publication is a serious matter and may be considered only after receiving written approval from all authors with a detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. The decision to accept or decline the change rests with the Chief Editor of the journal.
Upon request, authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc.
If there is any suspicion of misconduct, our board will carry out an investigation following the COPE guidelines. If the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been proven, it may result in the implementation of certain measures, for instance:
If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author(s).
If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or, in severe cases, the article will be completely retracted. The reason must be given in the published erratum or retraction note.
The author(s)' institution may be informed for the misconduct.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights
When reporting studies that involve human participants, authors should include a statement confirming that the studies have been approved by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments, or other comparable ethical standards.
If doubts exist about whether or not the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or other comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that a qualified ethics committee or institutional review board has explicitly approved of the doubtful aspects of the study.
The following statements should be included in the text before the References section:
Ethical approval: “All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.”
The welfare of animals used for research must be respected. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should indicate whether the institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
出版地:北京市
主編:何雅玲
編委會成員:
馬宗義機構:
中國科學院金屬研究所
研究領域:
金屬復合材料
王 剛機構:
上海大學
研究領域:
非晶合金
王樹聲機構:
西安建筑科技大學
研究領域:
城市規劃
王晉軍機構:
北京航空航天大學
研究領域:
流體力學
田永君機構:
燕山大學
研究領域:
超硬材料
馮 雪機構:
清華大學
研究領域:
固體力學
寧建國機構:
北京理工大學
研究領域:
工程力學
呂金虎機構:
北京航空航天大學
研究領域:
系統控制
呂海寶機構:
哈爾濱工業大學
研究領域:
特種環境復合材料
劉文廣機構:
天津大學
研究領域:
生物醫用高分子材料
劉漢龍機構:
重慶大學
研究領域:
土木工程
劉昌勝機構:
上海大學
研究領域:
生物材料
劉金國機構:
中國科學院沈陽自動化研究所
研究領域:
機器人與自動化裝備
劉 靜機構:
清華大學
研究領域:
傳熱學、生物醫學熱物理
李應紅機構:
空軍工程大學
研究領域:
航空宇航推進技術
李宏男機構:
大連理工大學
研究領域:
土木工程
李 強機構:
南京理工大學
研究領域:
工程熱物理與能源利用
吳宜燦機構:
中子科學國際研究院
研究領域:
核科學與技術
冷勁松機構:
哈爾濱工業大學
研究領域:
智能材料和復合材料力學
宋曉艷機構:
北京工業大學
研究領域:
材料科學,計算材料學
張田忠機構:
上海大學
研究領域:
材料力學/固體力學
陳云敏機構:
浙江大學
研究領域:
巖石工程
陳 光機構:
南京理工大學
研究領域:
金屬材料與加工
陳涌海機構:
中國科學院半導體研究所
研究領域:
半導體材料
周又和機構:
蘭州大學
研究領域:
多場耦合非線性力學
周順桂機構:
福建農林大學
研究領域:
有機固體廢物資源利用
寶音賀西機構:
清華大學
研究領域:
航天器動力學與控制
宗秋剛機構:
北京大學
研究領域:
空間科學
趙天壽機構:
南方科技大學
研究領域:
工程熱物理與能源科學
趙啟斌機構:
RIKEN, Japan
研究領域:
Machine learning, Tensor Learning Theory and Application
柯燎亮機構:
天津大學
研究領域:
薄膜力學
段海濱機構:
北京航空航天大學
研究領域:
導航、制導與控制
姜培學機構:
清華大學
研究領域:
工程熱物理
姜 潮機構:
湖南大學
研究領域:
汽車工程
姜 瀾機構:
北京理工大學
研究領域:
機械工程,激光微納制造
郭萬林機構:
南京航空航天大學
研究領域:
飛行器結構安全與智能化
郭 旭機構:
大連理工大學
研究領域:
計算力學、納米力學
席 光機構:
西安交通大學
研究領域:
動力工程與工程熱物理
陶 智機構:
北京航空航天大學
研究領域:
航空發動機
黃永安機構:
華中科技大學
研究領域:
柔性電子器件與應用
黃曉旭機構:
重慶大學
研究領域:
金屬材料
曹晉濱機構:
北京航空航天大學
研究領域:
空間環境探測技術
梁新剛機構:
清華大學
研究領域:
動力工程及工程熱物理
彭練矛機構:
北京大學
研究領域:
碳基電子學
舒 昌機構:
National University of Singapore, Singapore
研究領域:
流體力學
童美萍機構:
北京大學
研究領域:
水沙物質通量分析
翟婉明機構:
西南交通大學
研究領域:
鐵路工程
潘 兵機構:
北京航空航天大學
研究領域:
固體力學、光測力學
薛冬峰機構:
中國科學院深圳先進技術研究院
研究領域:
無機化學
魏悅廣機構:
北京大學
研究領域:
力學